Archive for September, 2005

Open-Source Constitution

Friday, September 30th, 2005

Introducing some Friday funnies…could this be the future?

From The Onion,

Congress Abandons WikiConstitution

WASHINGTON, DC—Congress scrapped the open-source, open-edit, online version of the Constitution Monday, only two months after it went live. “The idea seemed to dovetail perfectly with our tradition of democratic participation,” Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid said. “But when so-called ‘contributors’ began loading it down with profanity, pornography, ASCII art, and mandatory-assault-rifle-ownership amendments, we thought it might be best to cancel the project.” Congress intends to restore the Constitution to its pre-Wiki format as soon as an unadulterated copy of the document can be found.

That’s the Democratic Spirit, Harry

Friday, September 30th, 2005

Harry Reid Bulletin Board

The name for Senator Harry Reid’s site is telling enough. Shouldn’t politics be about working together for answers rather than “giving them hell”? That’s one of the many reasons why the Democratic party has faltered - the party stands less for America and more for itself.

Tags: [, , , ]

Redefining Marriage…Again

Friday, September 30th, 2005

3 Way 'Marriage'

From a psychotherapy perspective, this ‘marriage’ is doomed to fail based on the systemic theory of triangulation -

“Someone is always uncomfortable in a triangle and pushing for change. The insiders solidify their bond by choosing each other in preference to the less desirable outsider. Someone choosing another person over oneself arouses particularly intense feelings of rejection. “

Tags: [, , , , , , , , , ]

Bring ‘Em On!

Friday, September 30th, 2005

Yankees vs. Red Sox

Tags: [, , , , , ]

Sex With Children is Good

Tuesday, September 27th, 2005

WorldNetDaily highlights a book that appears to promote adult-child sex as “beneficial” by serving a “mentoring function.”

The book, “Same-Sex Desire and Love in Greco-Roman Antiquity and in the Classical Tradition of the West,” includes a chapter by Bruce Rind called, “Pederasty: An Integration of Cross-Cultural, Cross-Species, and Empirical Data.”

Here’s the chapter synopsis:

“Pederasty, or sexual relations between men and adolescent boys, is condemned in our society as an unqualified evil that maims and destroys. In ancient Greece, samurai Japan, and numerous other cultures, pederasty was seen as the noblest of human relations, conducive if not essential to nurturing the adolescent’s successful intellectual and physical maturation…

The current article examines empirical rather than clinical data on pederasty, and supplements this with cross-cultural and cross-species perspectives. The empirical data show that pederasty is not only not predestined to injure, but can benefit the adolescent when practiced according to the ancient Greek form. Cross-cultural and cross-species data show the extensiveness of pederasty in the natural world, as well as its functional rather than pathological nature in these societies and species.”

This is unfathomable! A scientific article that appears to promote pederasty? What if we were examining an adult male having “consensual” sex with an adolescent girl?

The point here has nothing to do with whether or not a child (or adolescent) will be traumatized by such an experience. Just because trauma may not occur does not make it right. Aren’t adults charged with protecting the innocent?

This is not the first time Bruce Rind has submitted controversial “scholarly” research for publication.

Fortunately, WorldNetDaily did a great job pointing out this outrageous book. Here’s what I found on the publisher’s site after they received complaints:

“The Haworth Press, Inc., has cancelled publication of this book. The company Board of Directors and Ethics Committee met on the matter and have voted not to proceed with publication of the book.

Our editors generally have sole authority over what they decide to publish in the journals and books they edit, and this good-faith agreement usually works well, but on occasion, an editor accepts something that sparks negative controversy.

We have decided not to go ahead with publication of this book. We wish to note that the majority of this book deals with the historical aspect of homosexuality in ancient Greece and Rome, which is classified as scholarship. Readers have noted, however, that one chapter of the book could be interpreted as advocating adult and adolescent sexuality. We thank the public for bringing this to our attention.

Haworth publishes many valuable journals and books on the treatment and prevention of child sexual abuse, and we wish to reiterate our commitment to the treatment and prevention of all types of abuse against children and others.”

Tags: [, , , , , , , , , ]

Why Do Ya Care?

Wednesday, September 21st, 2005

Barry Bonds

I’m surprised to admit this, but I agree with Barry Bonds’ recent comments.

Let me clarify myself first. A majority of Bonds’ statements to the press appeared to simply deflect the steroid issue. I think the issue itself is worth addressing, but not by the federal government (except for investigating Palmeiro’s potential lies while under oath). According to the ESPN article,

“Several congressional committees have held hearings on drug testing in pro sports, and legislation has been proposed to standardize leagues’ drug policies.”

What gives the federal government the right to legislate the way professional sports governs itself? If anything illegal has occured, then leave it to the courts. However, leave policy surrounding professional sports to these respective leagues.

Tags: [, , , , , , , ]

What is Hate?

Wednesday, September 21st, 2005

Washington Nationals chaplain, Jon Moeller

A recent Washington Post article highlighted the influence of Christian chapel services in Major League Baseball clubhouses. The article discussed chapel services offered by volunteer ministers, coordinated by Baseball Chapel.

Unfortunately, there’s been some recent news surrounding a simple head nod and a player remark in a chapel service held for Washington Nationals players and personnel. Here’s the gist:

As a result of the original Washington Post article, the politically-correct police has swooped down because of the following portion of the article:

The players not only pray, but they also discuss personal matters — marital tension, addiction issues, family illnesses, financial stress — drawing sometimes surprising lessons. [Washington National player Ryan] Church was concerned because his former girlfriend was Jewish. He turned to [Chaplain Jon] Moeller, “I said, like, Jewish people, they don’t believe in Jesus. Does that mean they’re doomed? Jon nodded, like, that’s what it meant. My ex-girlfriend! I was like, man, if they only knew. Other religions don’t know any better. It’s up to us to spread the word.”

Now, here’s the controversy. Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld, leader of Ohev Sholom Talmud Torah (The National Synagogue, the oldest Orthodox synagogue in Washington, DC.), is upset at Ryan Church’s comments and Chaplain Moeller’s agreement and says that “the Nationals did a good job about bringing hate into the locker room.”

Rabbi Shmuel, can you please indicate where the “hate” is? Are you angry that this Christian belief slights persons of other faiths because it is not all-inclusive?

What about some of the things you have to say to your congregation? After looking at the “social issues” section of your Internet site, I noticed that this is what you had to say about intermarriage (Intermarriage Part II - 2/18/2005):

“I once took a summer class on religion in City College. I was the only Jewish person. I was also the only white person in the class. When I shared with the class, that I would not even consider dating a non-Jew, they thought my approach was racist and elitist. It did not resonate with them at all. How can we justify the prohibition of intermarriage to a world that worships multiculturalism and diversity?

So, your Jewish heritage and belief indicates that you should not intermarry. Could this too be considered hate? The Washington Post article quoted other religious people who felt that other religions should have equal time in their ministering to players and personnel of Major League Baseball teams. I’m sure that other ministries are always welcome, just as “Baseball Chapel” has been welcomed - however, I’m sure there is a supply and demand component to this. And for you folks who throw out the “separation of church and state” fallacy, remember that Major League Baseball teams are privately held.

My point to Rabbi Shmuel is that we must be careful when we throw out the word “hate.” It becomes attributed to anyone who does not drink the kool aid of moral relativism which is often masked under the guise of “tolerance.”

Tags: [, , , , , , , , ]

The First Ever Gay Slasher Film!

Thursday, September 15th, 2005

Hellbent movie

Genres, genres everywhere. I thought it was bad enough when I felt the need to classify Christian music to a level of specificity that matches mainstream music…

Music>>Rock>>(Christian) Rock>>(Christian) Alternative Rock

Now we see the following…

Movies>>Horror>>Slasher>>(Gay) Slasher

Movies>>Western>>(Gay) Western

It seems that the homosexual agenda is trying to get its claws in absolutely everything, even when sexuality has no bearing on a genre. What does sexuality have to do with a slasher movie? I can understand a homosexual love story, which Brokeback Mountain appears to portray. However, it seems very difficult for me to buy a homosexual love story that takes place in the 1960s in Wyoming, of all places! Sure, it’s possible, but this is nothing more than the homosexual agenda trying to normalize the lifestyle to the extreme.

Tags: [, , , , , , , ]

Preach it, Sister

Tuesday, September 13th, 2005

Amen. Why are those who are quick to use the race card also quick to further perpetuate racism with apparent separatist rhetoric?

Stick to the Music, Kanye West (Reprise)

Tuesday, September 13th, 2005

I recently commented on Kanye West’s antics, and W.C. Varones pointed out another gem when West took part in the Live 8 festivities in Philadelphia. Here’s what he said to MTV:

“[t]he concept of AIDS alone—what my parents always told me, who are activists—is that it was a man-made disease in the first place that was placed in Africa just like how crack was placed in the black community to break up the Black Panther Party.”

I do not deny that racism exists in America. However, I have a hard time accepting some of the recent claims. What concerns me most is that it seems that these claims only fuel the fire of racism - they are destructive (not constructive) criticisms. I do know of friends who believe that the reaction to Katrina was racist, but I just cannot get to the heart of this belief.

In contrast to Kanye West, U2 is such a class act. Despite criticism from more ignorants like Mos Def, U2 performed a phenomenal rendition of “One” with none other than Mary J. Blige for the Hurricane Relief Benefit: Shelter From The Storm. So, instead of introducing divisive dialogue, U2 preaches a message of coming together, a message that became that much stronger when Blige joined in. Here’s some of the lyrics from the song:

One love
One blood
One life
You got to do what you should
One life
With each other

Sisters
Brothers
One life
But we’re not the same
We get to
Carry each other
Carry each other

One…life

One

Here’s the kicker. Despite Kanye West’s criticism of white leadership and Mos Def’s criticism of Bono for “turning his back” on the Hurricane Katrina tragedy, Kanye West will be opening for U2 on the December leg of their North American tour!

Tags: [, , , , , , ]