Where do you draw the line for decency in Halloween costumes?
Tags: [Bill Maher, Steve Irwin, Halloween, costume, decency, RWRW]
Where do you draw the line for decency in Halloween costumes?
Tags: [Bill Maher, Steve Irwin, Halloween, costume, decency, RWRW]
I am sympathetic towards Muslims who feel that any visual representation of Mohammad is considered an abomination. I also understand how offensive it can be when mainstream media marginalizes or even mocks the significance of a religious figure - the recent image of Kanye West as Jesus on the cover of Rolling Stone comes to mind (as a sidebar, as La Shawn Barber points out, could Kanye have gotten away with posing as Mohammad on the cover?).
A thoughtful Muslim, Imran Anwar, provides us with his take on the cartoon situation:
“Would all these “fair and balanced” media and papers publish cartoons (in the name of free speech) showing Prophet Jesus Christ as a big Homosexual telling his apostles and followers to become Christian priests and rape little boys in Church? After all, this is a constant “current events” topic, especially in America and who knows in how many other countries, where the church is consantly hiding and protecting abusive priests who molest children.”
Imran brings up an interesting point. What we’re talking about is disparaging a religious figure, and certainly Jesus has gotten his share. Movies like “The Life of Brian” and “The Last Temptation of Christ” are only the tip of the iceberg, but had a cartoon shown Jesus raping a child, I’m sure the Catholic Church, and all Christians, would be rightfully up in arms.
The difference, however, is that some Muslims make matters worse by proving that there’s an element of truth to the images aligning mainstream Muslims with violent and uncivilized behavior. Don’t you find it ironic that a cartoon aligning violence with Muslims then spurs on violence? Now Denmark has issued a warning to its citizens against traveling to 14 Muslim nations for fear of violence.
It seems that the truth hurts, even if the truth is utterly offensive. Although adolescent in nature, at least Iran has responded in a nonviolent manner.
I cannot believe how Ray Nagin can be mayor of New Orleans. His rhetoric is divisive, he blames the federal government for all of his city’s ills, and he makes irresponsible charges of racism coupled with his own racist comments. Take what he recently said:
“Surely God is mad at America. He sent us hurricane after hurricane after hurricane, and it’s destroyed and put stress on this country,” Nagin, who is black, said as he and other city leaders marked Martin Luther King Day.
“Surely he doesn’t approve of us being in Iraq under false pretenses. But surely he is upset at black America also. We’re not taking care of ourselves.”
The A.P. also indicated that “Nagin also promised that New Orleans will be a “chocolate” city again. Many of the city’s black neighborhoods were heavily damaged by Katrina.”
Nagin continues:
“It’s time for us to come together. It’s time for us to rebuild New Orleans — the one that should be a chocolate New Orleans,” the mayor said. “This city will be a majority African American city. It’s the way God wants it to be. You can’t have New Orleans no other way. It wouldn’t be New Orleans.”
There’s been a lot of focus on his “chocolate” comment, but I won’t focus too much on that, except to say that no white mayor could get away with calling his/her city a “white chocolate” city if it were predominantly composed of Caucasians. Instead, I’d like to focus on his God-talk.
So, Mayor Nagin feels that God wants New Orleans to be a majority African American city? As La Shawn Barber quips,
“I challenge all bloggers (and journalists) who criticized Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell for “divine retribution†statements to jump on New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin for making similar statements.”
Let’s take Nagin’s statement above and come up with an identical scenario…
Ray Nagin - “It’s time for us to come together. It’s time for us to rebuild New Orleans — the one that should be a chocolate New Orleans,” the mayor said. “This city will be a majority African American city. It’s the way God wants it to be. You can’t have New Orleans no other way. It wouldn’t be New Orleans.”
Fake White Mayor - “It’s time for us to come together. It’s time for us to rebuild Wichita — the one that should be a white chocolate Wichita,” the mayor said. “This city will be a majority Caucasian city. It’s the way God wants it to be. You can’t have Wichita no other way. It wouldn’t be Wichita.”
Liberals would be outraged if the latter comment were, indeed, uttered and not made up to prove a point. So, is there such thing as reverse racism or do minority races get a free pass? I believe there is such a thing as reverse racism and Nagin’s words and actions since his notoriety in the Katrina aftermath have proven him unfit to be mayor.
Tags: [Ray Nagin, racism, reverse racism, Katrina, New Orleans, La Shawn Barber, LaShawn Barber]
Long time no post. I’ve been a bit busy personally since my wife and I welcomed twins into the world! Needless to say, I haven’t had much free time to comment here.
Anyway, I found political-correctness run amok again. I happen to have a university email address. The email administrators chose to use Mirapoint for its web email solution. Here’s a portion of the university’s recent communication to all web email users, explaining that they will be changing the algorithm for determining junk mail:
“The Mirapoint software is distributed using “White List” and “Black List,” terms frequently used in the software industry for “pre-approved” and “blocked” addresses. Mirapoint, the product vendor, has acknowledged our request to replace these with color neutral terms in a future release.“
Does anyone really find these terms offensive?
Tags: [politically correct, political correctness, pc, Mirapoint, racism]
A recent Washington Post article highlighted the influence of Christian chapel services in Major League Baseball clubhouses. The article discussed chapel services offered by volunteer ministers, coordinated by Baseball Chapel.
Unfortunately, there’s been some recent news surrounding a simple head nod and a player remark in a chapel service held for Washington Nationals players and personnel. Here’s the gist:
As a result of the original Washington Post article, the politically-correct police has swooped down because of the following portion of the article:
The players not only pray, but they also discuss personal matters — marital tension, addiction issues, family illnesses, financial stress — drawing sometimes surprising lessons. [Washington National player Ryan] Church was concerned because his former girlfriend was Jewish. He turned to [Chaplain Jon] Moeller, “I said, like, Jewish people, they don’t believe in Jesus. Does that mean they’re doomed? Jon nodded, like, that’s what it meant. My ex-girlfriend! I was like, man, if they only knew. Other religions don’t know any better. It’s up to us to spread the word.”
Now, here’s the controversy. Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld, leader of Ohev Sholom Talmud Torah (The National Synagogue, the oldest Orthodox synagogue in Washington, DC.), is upset at Ryan Church’s comments and Chaplain Moeller’s agreement and says that “the Nationals did a good job about bringing hate into the locker room.”
Rabbi Shmuel, can you please indicate where the “hate” is? Are you angry that this Christian belief slights persons of other faiths because it is not all-inclusive?
What about some of the things you have to say to your congregation? After looking at the “social issues” section of your Internet site, I noticed that this is what you had to say about intermarriage (Intermarriage Part II - 2/18/2005):
“I once took a summer class on religion in City College. I was the only Jewish person. I was also the only white person in the class. When I shared with the class, that I would not even consider dating a non-Jew, they thought my approach was racist and elitist. It did not resonate with them at all. How can we justify the prohibition of intermarriage to a world that worships multiculturalism and diversity?“
So, your Jewish heritage and belief indicates that you should not intermarry. Could this too be considered hate? The Washington Post article quoted other religious people who felt that other religions should have equal time in their ministering to players and personnel of Major League Baseball teams. I’m sure that other ministries are always welcome, just as “Baseball Chapel” has been welcomed - however, I’m sure there is a supply and demand component to this. And for you folks who throw out the “separation of church and state” fallacy, remember that Major League Baseball teams are privately held.
My point to Rabbi Shmuel is that we must be careful when we throw out the word “hate.” It becomes attributed to anyone who does not drink the kool aid of moral relativism which is often masked under the guise of “tolerance.”
Tags: [Washington Nationals, Rabbi Shmuel, baseball, hate, tolerance, moral relativism, Christianity, Judaism, Baseball Chapel]
Why do we need Gitmo?
Michael Ramirez has some great editorial cartoons!
Tags: [Guantanimo Bay, Gitmo, editorial, cartoon, editorial cartoon, politics, Durbin, war on terror]
From My Way News:
“The U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday approved a constitutional amendment that would give Congress the power to ban desecration of the American flag, a measure that for the first time stands a chance of passing the Senate as well.”
Any time our legislators move to amend the Constitution, I feel a pang of anxiety. Yes, burning the U.S. flag is abominable, but people should be free to express themselves, as long as it’s done in a safe way in a place where such expression does not constitute trespassing. What’s next? Will persons be fined or jailed for flushing the Q’uran or the Bible down a toilet?
Tags: [flag, flag burning, Constitution, politics, Bible, Koran, Quran, Q'uran]

Why is there so much news coverage regarding an “erroneous” Newsweek story that apparently sparked violence in Afghanistan? How can someone screw up a report mentioning that U.S. interrogators at Guantanamo Bay desecrated the Koran (Q’uran) by flushing it down a toilet? The respected reporters apparently checked and doublechecked with their anonymous Pentagon source, yet the source eventually backed down. Could the story actually be true, yet Newsweek printed a retraction due to political correctness?
Does anyone honestly think that the United States may not have used a similar interrogation tactic in the past? Sorry, but political correctness simply doesn’t work when interrogating enemies of the United States. To remedy any uncertainty, I propose that if a source is unwilling to be identified, then the media should not be allowed to run stories with anonymous sources. Anonymous sources have been used much too often in an effort to out-scoop the competition.
Nevertheless, how can the United States be so up in arms about this event, yet we don’t react whatsoever when these other countries purposefully burn our flag or burn effigies of our political figures? In fact, the folks over at the USS Neverdock decries those who are up in arms about this, yet barely flinch when the Bible is desecrated.
What I find interesting is that the United States does its best not to offend other countries, particularly regarding the Muslim religion, yet the media has no problem straying from political correctness when it comes to Christianity.
I understand that things our country says and does affects the actions of others, but this event seems earily similar to the apologists who say that the United States is partly to blame for 9/11.
If the Afghans decide to get all upset and get violent and kill people, then they should be held accountable for their actions. I’ve been offended when the media has lambasted Christians, yet I don’t go around killing people and blaming it on the news media…
Own up to your actions, people of Afghanistan.
Tags: [Newsweek, Religion, political correctness, Guantanamo Bay, Koran, Quran, Muslim]
Is this political correctness run amok or is it the sensible use of television? It is being widely reported that the Sesame Street television show is giving an extreme makeover to one of its popular characters, the Cookie Monster. In a carb conscience culture, the show has decided that the character should model healthy eating habits to its audience of youngsters.
The BBC article notes that
“Almost one in three children in the US is now overweight, as opposed to one in 25 in the UK.”