Archive for the ‘Religion’ Category

One Thing to Do Before Giving a Child a Bible

Friday, May 11th, 2007

“Brother Maynard” details his thought process for buying a new Bible. The following idea really convicted me:

Once when he was giving a concert, I heard Michael Card say that he was reading his daughter’s Bible, which he explained that he bought each of his kids a Bible and read it before giving it to them. And as he read it, he made notes in the margins, speaking directly to whichever child’s Bible he was reading… so that years later as they read it, their father would be speaking to them in the margins concerning the text and its application for their lives.

I find that my quiet time is inconsistent at best, and usually the excuse comes down to how busy my life is. When life gets busy, God gets cut out. However, the added incentive of having something to pass to my children is certainly food for thought!

Tags: [, , , , , , ]

First and Foremost

Sunday, January 28th, 2007

Number One

Passage

Mark 12:28-34 (NLT)

Reflection

Today’s church message was on Mark 12:28-34 where a scribe asked Jesus, “Of all the commandments, which is the most important?” Jesus response was to quote Deuteronomy 6:4-5,

“4 Listen, O Israel! The Lord is our God, the Lord alone.
5 And you must love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your strength.”

Jesus followed by stating in Mark 12:31,

“The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no commandment greater than these.”

What does is mean to love God with our heart, soul, mind, and strength? Interesting that the Deateronomy passage does not include “mind” yet Jesus includes it in the Mark passage. I’m particularly intrigued by how Christ appears to start with the most important - the heart - and then concludes with our strength. Our love for Him must first start with our heart. One of the people at the service today prayed, asking that God would “circumsize our hearts.” This really resonated with me - the idea being to seek for God to soften our hearts.

Prayer

God, please circumsize my heart. Please soften it. Give me the desire to love you with all of me. Give me the desire to always keep you first in my life. Amen.

Tags: [, , , , ]

Cloning the Soul

Saturday, January 27th, 2007

Dolly Cloned Sheep

An interesting idea is starting to percolate over at WIRED. What happens to a person’s soul if their physical body is cloned? Frankly, my quick take is that although physical characteristics are identical (much like that in identical twins), souls are obviously separate.

Your take?

Tags: [, , , , ]

This is How We Love one Another

Thursday, July 27th, 2006

Pearls Before Swine

Romans 12:14-16

“Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse. Rejoice with those who rejoice; mourn with those who mourn. Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position.[a] Do not be conceited.”

Truth in Cartoons

Tuesday, February 7th, 2006

Mohammad Cartoon

I am sympathetic towards Muslims who feel that any visual representation of Mohammad is considered an abomination. I also understand how offensive it can be when mainstream media marginalizes or even mocks the significance of a religious figure - the recent image of Kanye West as Jesus on the cover of Rolling Stone comes to mind (as a sidebar, as La Shawn Barber points out, could Kanye have gotten away with posing as Mohammad on the cover?).

A thoughtful Muslim, Imran Anwar, provides us with his take on the cartoon situation:

“Would all these “fair and balanced” media and papers publish cartoons (in the name of free speech) showing Prophet Jesus Christ as a big Homosexual telling his apostles and followers to become Christian priests and rape little boys in Church? After all, this is a constant “current events” topic, especially in America and who knows in how many other countries, where the church is consantly hiding and protecting abusive priests who molest children.”

Imran brings up an interesting point. What we’re talking about is disparaging a religious figure, and certainly Jesus has gotten his share. Movies like “The Life of Brian” and “The Last Temptation of Christ” are only the tip of the iceberg, but had a cartoon shown Jesus raping a child, I’m sure the Catholic Church, and all Christians, would be rightfully up in arms.

The difference, however, is that some Muslims make matters worse by proving that there’s an element of truth to the images aligning mainstream Muslims with violent and uncivilized behavior. Don’t you find it ironic that a cartoon aligning violence with Muslims then spurs on violence? Now Denmark has issued a warning to its citizens against traveling to 14 Muslim nations for fear of violence.

It seems that the truth hurts, even if the truth is utterly offensive. Although adolescent in nature, at least Iran has responded in a nonviolent manner.

Kanye’s at it Again

Wednesday, January 25th, 2006

Kanye West as Jesus

There’s really nothing to say about someone who cannot be taken seriously.

Tags: [, , , , ]

PETA Would Condemn Jesus

Wednesday, January 25th, 2006

For my devotions this morning I read an interesting passage in the book of Mark. Specifically, Mark 5:1-5:17 struck me:

Mark 5:1-17 (New International Version)
New International Version (NIV)

The Healing of a Demon-possessed Man

1They went across the lake to the region of the Gerasenes.[a] 2When Jesus got out of the boat, a man with an evil[b] spirit came from the tombs to meet him. 3This man lived in the tombs, and no one could bind him any more, not even with a chain. 4For he had often been chained hand and foot, but he tore the chains apart and broke the irons on his feet. No one was strong enough to subdue him. 5Night and day among the tombs and in the hills he would cry out and cut himself with stones.

6When he saw Jesus from a distance, he ran and fell on his knees in front of him. 7He shouted at the top of his voice, “What do you want with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? Swear to God that you won’t torture me!” 8For Jesus had said to him, “Come out of this man, you evil spirit!”

9Then Jesus asked him, “What is your name?”

“My name is Legion,” he replied, “for we are many.” 10And he begged Jesus again and again not to send them out of the area.

11A large herd of pigs was feeding on the nearby hillside. 12The demons begged Jesus, “Send us among the pigs; allow us to go into them.” 13He gave them permission, and the evil spirits came out and went into the pigs. The herd, about two thousand in number, rushed down the steep bank into the lake and were drowned.

14Those tending the pigs ran off and reported this in the town and countryside, and the people went out to see what had happened. 15When they came to Jesus, they saw the man who had been possessed by the legion of demons, sitting there, dressed and in his right mind; and they were afraid. 16Those who had seen it told the people what had happened to the demon-possessed man—and told about the pigs as well. 17Then the people began to plead with Jesus to leave their region.

Two things struck me about this passage. First, Jesus showed mercy to the demons! If Jesus shows mercy to servants of Satan, how must we behave towards those who are against us? Second, I was struck by how Jesus spared these demons and honored their request, yet He knew that these pigs would die. It appears that He places a higher regard to (evil) spirits than the “beasts of the field.” PETA would have protested his actions for sure.

Tags: [, , , , , , , ]

Why Misuse the Lord’s Name?

Wednesday, December 28th, 2005

Exodus 20:7 reads

“You shall not misuse the name of the LORD your God, for the LORD will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.”

I should probably take the time to conduct some scholarly research, but I’ve been thinking about this commandment for some time. It is often overlooked and considered a “lesser” infraction of the ten commandments.

What does it mean to misuse the name of the Lord? Does this include the derogatory use of Jesus’ name? Why is it that people use Jesus’ name as a filler or a curse during normal discourse? Is it a coincidence that it is His name that is used in this derogatory way as opposed to the use of another religious figure?

No use of Buddha, or of Mohommad, or Joseph Smith…is this a coincidence? I guess I’ve been troubled by this because it seems I’ve been hearing the third commandment broken routinely. Any thoughts?

Tags: [, , , , ,

What is Hate?

Wednesday, September 21st, 2005

Washington Nationals chaplain, Jon Moeller

A recent Washington Post article highlighted the influence of Christian chapel services in Major League Baseball clubhouses. The article discussed chapel services offered by volunteer ministers, coordinated by Baseball Chapel.

Unfortunately, there’s been some recent news surrounding a simple head nod and a player remark in a chapel service held for Washington Nationals players and personnel. Here’s the gist:

As a result of the original Washington Post article, the politically-correct police has swooped down because of the following portion of the article:

The players not only pray, but they also discuss personal matters — marital tension, addiction issues, family illnesses, financial stress — drawing sometimes surprising lessons. [Washington National player Ryan] Church was concerned because his former girlfriend was Jewish. He turned to [Chaplain Jon] Moeller, “I said, like, Jewish people, they don’t believe in Jesus. Does that mean they’re doomed? Jon nodded, like, that’s what it meant. My ex-girlfriend! I was like, man, if they only knew. Other religions don’t know any better. It’s up to us to spread the word.”

Now, here’s the controversy. Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld, leader of Ohev Sholom Talmud Torah (The National Synagogue, the oldest Orthodox synagogue in Washington, DC.), is upset at Ryan Church’s comments and Chaplain Moeller’s agreement and says that “the Nationals did a good job about bringing hate into the locker room.”

Rabbi Shmuel, can you please indicate where the “hate” is? Are you angry that this Christian belief slights persons of other faiths because it is not all-inclusive?

What about some of the things you have to say to your congregation? After looking at the “social issues” section of your Internet site, I noticed that this is what you had to say about intermarriage (Intermarriage Part II - 2/18/2005):

“I once took a summer class on religion in City College. I was the only Jewish person. I was also the only white person in the class. When I shared with the class, that I would not even consider dating a non-Jew, they thought my approach was racist and elitist. It did not resonate with them at all. How can we justify the prohibition of intermarriage to a world that worships multiculturalism and diversity?

So, your Jewish heritage and belief indicates that you should not intermarry. Could this too be considered hate? The Washington Post article quoted other religious people who felt that other religions should have equal time in their ministering to players and personnel of Major League Baseball teams. I’m sure that other ministries are always welcome, just as “Baseball Chapel” has been welcomed - however, I’m sure there is a supply and demand component to this. And for you folks who throw out the “separation of church and state” fallacy, remember that Major League Baseball teams are privately held.

My point to Rabbi Shmuel is that we must be careful when we throw out the word “hate.” It becomes attributed to anyone who does not drink the kool aid of moral relativism which is often masked under the guise of “tolerance.”

Tags: [, , , , , , , , ]

Intelligent Ignorance

Thursday, September 8th, 2005

Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne are predictable in their argument against intelligent design. After all, they are not ministers of the faith. Instead, they are scientists teaching evolutionary theory and espousing the scientific method in all that they do. By the way, couldn’t a counter-argument suggest to these authors that evolution is simply a euphemism for teaching atheism in America’s schools? It seems that these authors have an axe to grind against theists and any belief in a god - that somehow the “less evolved” might have valid answers that cannot be explained using the scientific method.

The debate between evolutionary theory and creationism (a.k.a. “intelligent design” or “ID”) is not something that can be addressed simply by saying that intelligent design cannot be proven through the scientific method. After all, creationists (who the authors naively imply are evangelical Christians who believe in a Biblical 7-day creation) at the end of the day must subscribe to faith in a god. Therefore, faith and science tend to make an oil and water mixture here.

(more…)