Archive for the ‘Christianity’ Category

One Thing to Do Before Giving a Child a Bible

Friday, May 11th, 2007

“Brother Maynard” details his thought process for buying a new Bible. The following idea really convicted me:

Once when he was giving a concert, I heard Michael Card say that he was reading his daughter’s Bible, which he explained that he bought each of his kids a Bible and read it before giving it to them. And as he read it, he made notes in the margins, speaking directly to whichever child’s Bible he was reading… so that years later as they read it, their father would be speaking to them in the margins concerning the text and its application for their lives.

I find that my quiet time is inconsistent at best, and usually the excuse comes down to how busy my life is. When life gets busy, God gets cut out. However, the added incentive of having something to pass to my children is certainly food for thought!

Tags: [, , , , , , ]

First and Foremost

Sunday, January 28th, 2007

Number One

Passage

Mark 12:28-34 (NLT)

Reflection

Today’s church message was on Mark 12:28-34 where a scribe asked Jesus, “Of all the commandments, which is the most important?” Jesus response was to quote Deuteronomy 6:4-5,

“4 Listen, O Israel! The Lord is our God, the Lord alone.
5 And you must love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your strength.”

Jesus followed by stating in Mark 12:31,

“The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no commandment greater than these.”

What does is mean to love God with our heart, soul, mind, and strength? Interesting that the Deateronomy passage does not include “mind” yet Jesus includes it in the Mark passage. I’m particularly intrigued by how Christ appears to start with the most important - the heart - and then concludes with our strength. Our love for Him must first start with our heart. One of the people at the service today prayed, asking that God would “circumsize our hearts.” This really resonated with me - the idea being to seek for God to soften our hearts.

Prayer

God, please circumsize my heart. Please soften it. Give me the desire to love you with all of me. Give me the desire to always keep you first in my life. Amen.

Tags: [, , , , ]

This is How We Love one Another

Thursday, July 27th, 2006

Pearls Before Swine

Romans 12:14-16

“Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse. Rejoice with those who rejoice; mourn with those who mourn. Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position.[a] Do not be conceited.”

Kanye’s at it Again

Wednesday, January 25th, 2006

Kanye West as Jesus

There’s really nothing to say about someone who cannot be taken seriously.

Tags: [, , , , ]

PETA Would Condemn Jesus

Wednesday, January 25th, 2006

For my devotions this morning I read an interesting passage in the book of Mark. Specifically, Mark 5:1-5:17 struck me:

Mark 5:1-17 (New International Version)
New International Version (NIV)

The Healing of a Demon-possessed Man

1They went across the lake to the region of the Gerasenes.[a] 2When Jesus got out of the boat, a man with an evil[b] spirit came from the tombs to meet him. 3This man lived in the tombs, and no one could bind him any more, not even with a chain. 4For he had often been chained hand and foot, but he tore the chains apart and broke the irons on his feet. No one was strong enough to subdue him. 5Night and day among the tombs and in the hills he would cry out and cut himself with stones.

6When he saw Jesus from a distance, he ran and fell on his knees in front of him. 7He shouted at the top of his voice, “What do you want with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? Swear to God that you won’t torture me!” 8For Jesus had said to him, “Come out of this man, you evil spirit!”

9Then Jesus asked him, “What is your name?”

“My name is Legion,” he replied, “for we are many.” 10And he begged Jesus again and again not to send them out of the area.

11A large herd of pigs was feeding on the nearby hillside. 12The demons begged Jesus, “Send us among the pigs; allow us to go into them.” 13He gave them permission, and the evil spirits came out and went into the pigs. The herd, about two thousand in number, rushed down the steep bank into the lake and were drowned.

14Those tending the pigs ran off and reported this in the town and countryside, and the people went out to see what had happened. 15When they came to Jesus, they saw the man who had been possessed by the legion of demons, sitting there, dressed and in his right mind; and they were afraid. 16Those who had seen it told the people what had happened to the demon-possessed man—and told about the pigs as well. 17Then the people began to plead with Jesus to leave their region.

Two things struck me about this passage. First, Jesus showed mercy to the demons! If Jesus shows mercy to servants of Satan, how must we behave towards those who are against us? Second, I was struck by how Jesus spared these demons and honored their request, yet He knew that these pigs would die. It appears that He places a higher regard to (evil) spirits than the “beasts of the field.” PETA would have protested his actions for sure.

Tags: [, , , , , , , ]

Why Misuse the Lord’s Name?

Wednesday, December 28th, 2005

Exodus 20:7 reads

“You shall not misuse the name of the LORD your God, for the LORD will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.”

I should probably take the time to conduct some scholarly research, but I’ve been thinking about this commandment for some time. It is often overlooked and considered a “lesser” infraction of the ten commandments.

What does it mean to misuse the name of the Lord? Does this include the derogatory use of Jesus’ name? Why is it that people use Jesus’ name as a filler or a curse during normal discourse? Is it a coincidence that it is His name that is used in this derogatory way as opposed to the use of another religious figure?

No use of Buddha, or of Mohommad, or Joseph Smith…is this a coincidence? I guess I’ve been troubled by this because it seems I’ve been hearing the third commandment broken routinely. Any thoughts?

Tags: [, , , , ,

What is Hate?

Wednesday, September 21st, 2005

Washington Nationals chaplain, Jon Moeller

A recent Washington Post article highlighted the influence of Christian chapel services in Major League Baseball clubhouses. The article discussed chapel services offered by volunteer ministers, coordinated by Baseball Chapel.

Unfortunately, there’s been some recent news surrounding a simple head nod and a player remark in a chapel service held for Washington Nationals players and personnel. Here’s the gist:

As a result of the original Washington Post article, the politically-correct police has swooped down because of the following portion of the article:

The players not only pray, but they also discuss personal matters — marital tension, addiction issues, family illnesses, financial stress — drawing sometimes surprising lessons. [Washington National player Ryan] Church was concerned because his former girlfriend was Jewish. He turned to [Chaplain Jon] Moeller, “I said, like, Jewish people, they don’t believe in Jesus. Does that mean they’re doomed? Jon nodded, like, that’s what it meant. My ex-girlfriend! I was like, man, if they only knew. Other religions don’t know any better. It’s up to us to spread the word.”

Now, here’s the controversy. Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld, leader of Ohev Sholom Talmud Torah (The National Synagogue, the oldest Orthodox synagogue in Washington, DC.), is upset at Ryan Church’s comments and Chaplain Moeller’s agreement and says that “the Nationals did a good job about bringing hate into the locker room.”

Rabbi Shmuel, can you please indicate where the “hate” is? Are you angry that this Christian belief slights persons of other faiths because it is not all-inclusive?

What about some of the things you have to say to your congregation? After looking at the “social issues” section of your Internet site, I noticed that this is what you had to say about intermarriage (Intermarriage Part II - 2/18/2005):

“I once took a summer class on religion in City College. I was the only Jewish person. I was also the only white person in the class. When I shared with the class, that I would not even consider dating a non-Jew, they thought my approach was racist and elitist. It did not resonate with them at all. How can we justify the prohibition of intermarriage to a world that worships multiculturalism and diversity?

So, your Jewish heritage and belief indicates that you should not intermarry. Could this too be considered hate? The Washington Post article quoted other religious people who felt that other religions should have equal time in their ministering to players and personnel of Major League Baseball teams. I’m sure that other ministries are always welcome, just as “Baseball Chapel” has been welcomed - however, I’m sure there is a supply and demand component to this. And for you folks who throw out the “separation of church and state” fallacy, remember that Major League Baseball teams are privately held.

My point to Rabbi Shmuel is that we must be careful when we throw out the word “hate.” It becomes attributed to anyone who does not drink the kool aid of moral relativism which is often masked under the guise of “tolerance.”

Tags: [, , , , , , , , ]

Intelligent Ignorance

Thursday, September 8th, 2005

Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne are predictable in their argument against intelligent design. After all, they are not ministers of the faith. Instead, they are scientists teaching evolutionary theory and espousing the scientific method in all that they do. By the way, couldn’t a counter-argument suggest to these authors that evolution is simply a euphemism for teaching atheism in America’s schools? It seems that these authors have an axe to grind against theists and any belief in a god - that somehow the “less evolved” might have valid answers that cannot be explained using the scientific method.

The debate between evolutionary theory and creationism (a.k.a. “intelligent design” or “ID”) is not something that can be addressed simply by saying that intelligent design cannot be proven through the scientific method. After all, creationists (who the authors naively imply are evangelical Christians who believe in a Biblical 7-day creation) at the end of the day must subscribe to faith in a god. Therefore, faith and science tend to make an oil and water mixture here.

(more…)

Remember Those Metal Days?

Thursday, August 18th, 2005

Whitecross 1987

I was raised in a Christian household and went to a Christian school since third grade. I also went to a Christian college. This upbringing introduced me to the Christian music scene. But I’m not necessarily talking about the praise, worship and hymns many non-Christians may stereotype. Believe it or not, the Christian music scene has pretty much the same genres of music that are available to the mainstream - the only difference is that the lyrics are often Biblically-based or considered family-friendly.

Over the years, many of these Christian bands were second rate alternatives to their mainstream counterparts, but a lot has changed. Groups like Stryper, Jars of Clay, Lifehouse, Sixpence None the Richer, Amy Grant, Michael W. Smith, DC Talk and others have found success in the mainstream and Christian scenes alike.

This brings me to talk about a recent happening. Last weekend I visited my brother in the Chicago-area. I went to his church and was surprised to find that Rex Carroll was playing in the worship band! Rex was the mastermind behind Whitecross, the Christian heavy metal group I enjoyed back in the day. Although I never really was into the metal scene, Whitecross was one of those groups that really allowed me to “praise and worship” while listening to some cool music. Rex Carroll is a phenomenal guitarist - I would encourage you to check out their most popular release entitled In the Kingdom.

Interestingly, after speaking with Rex I found out that the group decided to reform to re-record their original self-titled debut album. They are taking pre-orders for the album due for a September 12, 2005 release.

Tags: [, , , , , , , , , ]

A Call to Be Radical Christians! Part III

Monday, June 13th, 2005

Queer and Christian: A Response

The third and final installment of my three part series on being Radical Christians deals with evangelical Christians and our failure to be a light in the GLBT community. I recently stumbled upon a blog (technorati search on “Christianity” revealed the post) that appears to deal with GLBT issues. More interestingly, I stumbled upon a specific post from one of the authors entitled, “Queer and Christian?” Here’s a portion of what the Ona Marae had to say:

“I am one of those people that finds it easier to be Queer in a sometimes hostile Christian environment than being Christian in most Queer environments. This is not due to a wishy-washy faith or embarassment about my beliefs, but rather the fact that Christianity has been used to do massive spiritual violence against my community.

If you look carefully, it’s not the agnostics or athiests in this country doing the Queer-bashing, it is, for the vast majority of the time, Christians. While there are other world religions who find homosexuality (etc) incompatible with thier teachings, American Christianity has it down to a nasty and political science.”

Ona goes on to say:

“To be as brief as possible, Liberation theology comes out of Latin America and basically states that God is on the side of the Oppressed. If you look through all the texts Christians call their Bible, you will see that God stands in alignment with the marginalized, the oppressed, the widow and orphan, the refugee, women, Samaritans, Lepers and anyone else who is ostracized by their society. I find it interesting that Jesus’ words of accusation were for the religious leadership of his day, not for the people they called “sinner”. I wonder who he would call a serpent today….”

Hmm…God is on the side of the oppressed? I’m not quite sure I can follow this line of reasoning. Once again, I will try to offer my “radical right wing religious” perspective as civilly as possible. I do not want to put GID and other sexual issues discussed here on the same level as what I’m about to say, so please do not misunderstand me.

At what point would you draw the line on this “oppressed” line of thought? Would God be “on the side” of the oppressed folks who have sexual inclinations (whether nature or nurture) towards incest or bestiality or necrophilia? The point I want to make is that these groups (bestiality, alcoholics, incest, necrophilia) too can be considered oppressed because society would frown on persons who have these sexual inclinations or persons who embrace alcoholism. The Bible instructs persons to not get imbibed on too much alcohol and it also instructs persons not to have sexual relationships with family members, animals, the dead, or persons of the same sex. That’s my perspective which I feel is clearly laid out in the Bible. Others more knowledgeable than I can provide better arguments on the subject.

This isn’t about taking sides…but if God did take sides, He would take the side of humanity - because we are ALL sinners. I sympathize with anyone who does not “choose” to be the way there are, but resulting behaviors are not necessarily in line with what God would consider “blameless.” And, as Christians, aren’t we instructed to be imitators of Christ, to strive to be pure and blameless? Now, while I may disagree with the “taking sides” argument, I do believe that Jesus Christ died for EVERYONE, regardless of inclinations based on nature or nurture. It is His forgiveness of our sins that allows us to be seen as blameless, but we must be repentant.

Christians Have Failed to Love GLBT “Others”

Nonetheless, I agree with Ona that the evangelical Christian community has done an abominable job reaching out to these oppressed persons, but I would argue that the failings of evangelical Christians is primarily due to apathy or selfish concerns (e.g., preserving traditional values, etc.), not hate. Certainly the GLBT agenda threatens evangelical Christians because, unlike the other “opressed” groups I mentioned, society is beginning to accept the GLBT agenda - that these behaviors are perfectly normal and acceptable. Radical groups like God Hates Fags paint Christians in a hateful angry light, but the challenge is for Christians to make their voice heard too in a thoughtful way. Groups like James Dobson’s (Focus on the Family) PAC try to, but perhaps they too cross the line at times. “Mainstream” evangelical Christians might instead be apathetic because they feel that it might be a lost cause to reach out to people who seem unwilling to interpret the Bible as a God-breathed literal text instead of a “dynamic” text that changes with society’s norms?

“Less Judgment, More Love” (By Words and Actions)

As I mentioned in an earlier post of this series, I feel that Christians need to walk a fine line between judgment and compassion. It is much easier to be aloof and judgmental rather than participatory and compassionate. I believe evangelical Christians must make their thoughts known, but in a loving way. Take what Leviticus 19:7 has to say:

“Do not hate your brother in your heart. Rebuke your neighbor frankly so you will not share in his guilt.”

I believe that this powerful yet simple verse explains it all. As Christians, we must acknowledge that we too are the worst of sinners, but we should compassionately point out the sin of others, yet love them, not hate them or ostracise them.

In my call for us to be Radical Christians, how might we reach out to the GLBT community for Christ? Perhaps in following the South Beach Diet credo of “less (bad) carbs, more (good) protein,” Radical Christians should follow a credo of “less judgment, more love.” If we acknowledge that we are just as sinful and struggle with temptations equally, then perhaps we can view others more as Jesus does. GLBT persons will not change their behavior just because a Radical Christian calls them sick sinners. Similarly, I might not change my behavior if I did not respect the opinion of the person who challenged me. Evangelical Christians do not win converts or transform a person, only God does. Therefore, let’s give room for God to work - state your position, but then through words and actions, love as Christ loves.

Thus concludes this series, “A Call to be Radical Christians.” I believe that Christians must

  • stand up for what we believe;
  • equally show love and compassion to others;
  • remember that Jesus spent much of His ministry preaching love;
  • remember that God (not humankind) changes hearts; and
  • prove the old addage “actions speak louder than words” true by following Christ’s command in John 13:34:

“A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.”

Tags: [, , , , , , ]